Friday Foxies XXXVI.
Just like a week ago, this week’s edition of FF was inspired by DarkoV. Once upon a time I had an outburts over at Michael M.’s about Czech and Polish tourists who as a rule drive to the Adriatic coast in packs of three, driving everyone else nuts. DarkoV has dubbed them Holy Czech Trinity and reminded me of them while we were both commenting my favourite moose’s latest IT aquisition. And all of a sudden I went…. Holy Czech Trinity, huh…. Now there’s an idea….
And thus I give you a Holy Trinity of Czech porn stars. All hail Verionika Pagacova, Renata Daninsky and Lucie Theodorovna
So… Who’s who in this picture? 
And what’ll it be next week, then? French porn starlets?
July 20th, 2007 at 3:47 am
I was debating whether to bring this up or not but wth. Does anyone think the powder blue panties look good/sexy? IMO, it makes the person wearing it look worse. That high-waist design always leaves me scratching my head…it reminds me of old people wearing their pant waist above their bellybutton. lol. Do either men or women on here find it attractive?…I know most of the men aren’t really “concentrating” on that part of the picture right now!
But I know a lot of women say they buy lingerie to make themselves feel sexy and not solely to arouse a man. So what do the women think of this type of pantie? 
July 20th, 2007 at 7:08 am
If you’ll have French porn starlets, I demand Clara Morgane.
If you’re already asking about the order of the foxies, you could at least change the order a bit to make it more difficult.
P.S. And now I’m happy again… My assumptions were correct after all.
July 20th, 2007 at 7:13 am
@ Michael N: My ex loved that.
I didn’t though… I remember him always pulling my panties up above my hips and me, pulling them down where they were intended to stay. So such “weirdos” do exist, but luckily they are rare.
If you ask me high-waist design panties makes my ass look too big (high) and somehow shapeless…
July 20th, 2007 at 9:02 am
@Michael N.: In this scenario I’d always go with the “less is more” routine :mgreen:
@Sunshine: Former porn stars don’t count…
July 20th, 2007 at 9:24 am
Michael, neither I find that blue panties too attractive (same goes for the black stuff). It would definetely look better on my flat’s floor than on her
- Honestly, like in other domains of life, also in this case I’d care more for the content and less for the packing 
July 20th, 2007 at 10:04 am
Although -in this case the “packing” has a multitude of secondary uses
July 20th, 2007 at 10:26 am
No panties, no problems!
July 20th, 2007 at 10:59 am
and users
July 20th, 2007 at 12:57 pm
@dr. filomena: Huh?
Waddayoumean “no users”?
July 20th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
Ok let me elaborate. This is an interesting though unattractive shot. OK composition, excellent choice of background to go with theme. Lacks foxyness, though, at least to my eyes. I do appreciate a beautiful and seductive woman, but find nothing alluring about three pieces of meet in the butcher’s shop. Perhaps this is something that can be overcome by a good, healthy level of testosterone. I’m not privy to that information.
If anything, however, this product does boast a particular positive side in that it follows the popular concept of recycling. Both - main subjects and their attire are intended for multiple uses and users.
I’m slightly worried about the fact that the subject in red is wearing shoes dangerously similar to a pair of my own. Mine have less of the black strapping, but this shot explains some of the comments I’ve had
July 20th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
@ Pengovsky - From demure to this in just a week? I will be expecting the man of my dreams on Monday Meat!
@ Michael N - I am a panties at the hipline kinda girl, I feel that one continuous flow of skin looks better than the line of grandma underpants in the middle of stomach.
@ Morska - There’s a popular poster here in certain shop windows in the States that says No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service to keep certain customers out. I am tempted to make your “No panties? No problem” into a similar sign.
@ Dr. Filomena - The problem is this is a poor Photoshop job. It looks like someone cut it with large scissors from the cover of a porn video.
July 20th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
@dr. filomena: OK, now let me explain
this is not a professional pic… It is a cut-n-paste job done by yours trully. I thought that was obvious 
It’s just that it is impossible to find all three babes in the same pic (without them being covered in sperm and in the company of one or more male appendages)
However, I do agree that it lacks (shall we say) a certian amount of seductiveness. It has a more of “come-and-get-me” feel to it which can have just the opposite effect.
Personally, I’d go for Lucie (the one in red). I guess it does explain the shoes, then
July 20th, 2007 at 1:45 pm
@camille: Guilty as charged! It’s hard to do this using a trackpad… I left my electronic rodent at work that particular night and doing “Advanced PhotoShop” sans mouse is tantamount to slow and paintful death
Re: man of you dreams: Did we cover that subject (I forget) or do you have any pointers to share?
July 20th, 2007 at 2:08 pm
Hmmm,
My idea of the Holy Czech Trinity were a bit more, well, costumed. And I’m almost 100% positive, there was at least One of the Three holding a cross or something; none of them were holding anything so, uhmmm, spongy.
But, I’m glad to see that certain things do come in three’s (and two’s as well, so this is a 3 x 2 special deal here).
July 20th, 2007 at 2:17 pm
Hey, P! Stop taking me seriously
She says with tongue firmly planted in cheek 
True re. shoes, though.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:22 pm
Camille: I do apreciate your understanding.
P: Are you sure there’s no sperm down there? I think I saw it on the right shoe of the most atractive one.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
@Darko V: To quote Slovene rock-poet Jani Kovačič All things heavenly come in three’s. How strange that people come only in two’s
@dr. filomena: I just needed an excuse
And this time it’s you who has given me an idea for a post… A mojito is on me 
@Morska: Wipe your monitor!
July 20th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
@pengovsky: No need for me to give you pointers. I think you can use this picture as guidance. Remember less is not more, MORE IS MORE.
in regards to this Jani Kovačič quote about “people only coming in twos”, it sounds like he didn’t live a very adventurous life…..
July 20th, 2007 at 2:50 pm
Good old one-of-a-kind Jani. He taught my philosophy class in high school. Pa se nič ne pozna
Let me guess… high heel shoes? Can’t wait. Will take you up on the mojito.
July 20th, 2007 at 2:59 pm
@camille: Will remember that… More is more. More is more. More is more is more is…
Re: Jani Kovačič: He’s the 60’s generation, so I guess he wasn’t immune to adventurous life
One of his more relaxed songs starts with
My girl has a black pussy, I wanna play with it all night long.
My girl has a black pussy, but I must part with it for way too long
Remember, these were early 80s
@dr. filomena: Actually, no… But I like the way you think
Wait until Tuesday to find out…
re: mojito: Don’t wait until Tuesday
July 20th, 2007 at 3:00 pm
@dr. filomena: I forgot… I would have said “Give it up for Bežigrad”, but I went to Poljane High School
July 20th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
As far as I can remember, we had a Jani Kovačič koncert on the first language course I attended in Slovenia 2003. Didn’t understand very much back then. As far as I can remember, he said something like “Slovenians habe 2 problems: they are manic-depressive and they have dvojina”. At least if I got that right and my memories are not all wrong.
July 20th, 2007 at 4:32 pm
@ Dietmar
As a new student of the language, I can agree about this dvojina, though—at first–it does strike one as a bit lovely & romantic, ne?
July 20th, 2007 at 5:13 pm
We didn’t use “dvojina” and I think they still don’t use it at the sea side… I remember having problem at slovene cause of that.. The first good thing getting friends from the capital was learning to use it.. and I’m happy about it cause it sounds good.
July 20th, 2007 at 7:37 pm
..in the pic, I can see just three sweet fat cows ,) making self presentation.. ^.^
July 20th, 2007 at 7:43 pm
What about shoes and colors? And composition?
July 20th, 2007 at 7:59 pm
@Morska,
wow..!!! ahahaha :)) the composition is just a masterpiece of modern photography!!!…,) shoes..mmm.. I think they comming from the early neolite ages !:) but I’m most impressed from the white cover !..it’s so sexy ! ahahahaha
^.^
July 20th, 2007 at 11:38 pm
@Camille:
In my opinion, dvojina isn’t such a problem. But glagolski vid caused some afternoons full of headaches at my last language course. For non-slavic people it’s pain in the ass
July 21st, 2007 at 2:04 am
Why? “Glagolski vid” is basicaly the same as simple vs. continous… Is it not?
July 21st, 2007 at 11:11 am
Well, we didn’t do that simple vs. continuous stuff very well in school, so I can’t tell. We rushed that and consecrated more time on dead boring literature. For non-slavic people it’s quite strange to use different verbs for something. It was quite hard to understand and I’ll see how much I kept from winter term on, when I’ll try to attend some Slovene lessons at university. What I remember for sure was terrible headaches after a teacher explained the stuff to me in the afternoons in kind of private lessons. Don’t know why, but it really is complicated for non slavic people. Basically it’s one of that things in Slovene grammar that were only invented to annoy foreigners trying to learn that language, I’m quite sure about that